
Introduction
With the Department of War (née Department of Defense)’s Implementation of CMMC 2.0 now set to begin on November 10, 2025, MSPs have a strategic window to position themselves as trusted cybersecurity and compliance partners. Many of your existing or prospective clients, especially those in the defense industrial base will urgently need help navigating the regulatory, technical, and project management challenges of compliance. In this blog, we detail how MSPs can structure their offerings, approach implementation, mitigate risk, and deliver value in the CMMC era.
Why MSPs Are Uniquely Positioned
- Technical depth + compliance understanding
Your team already maintains security stacks, policy frameworks, monitoring, patching, identity, logging, backups, and more. Many of the controls demanded by CMMC build on existing cybersecurity hygiene. The gap lies in formal documentation, process maturity, and attestations. - Scaling affordability and efficiency
Many smaller defense contractors lack in-house cybersecurity staff. MSPs can aggregate specialization across clients, spread tooling and process development costs, and amortize risk. - Ongoing lifecycle support
CMMC isn’t a “one and done” checkbox — maintaining “current CMMC status,” monitoring changes, and managing continuous compliance will be critical. MSPs that embed compliance into managed security, monitoring, or support contracts can create durable revenue streams.
Key Phases in CMMC Implementation for MSPs & Clients
Here is a high-level roadmap you can use internally and with your clients:
Phase | Core Activities | MSP Role / Deliverables |
Initial assessment & scoping | Identify the CMMC level required, map out systems that handle FCI / CUI, inventory current controls, perform gap analysis | Lead or co‑lead the gap assessment, supply templates, interrogate current tooling and posture |
Documentation & planning | Build the System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M), policy artifacts, control mappings | Draft or co‑develop policies, help clients operationalize plans, assist in aligning technology to policy |
Remediation & control implementation | Deploy or refine identity controls, encryption, endpoint security, logging, network segmentation, vulnerability scanning, access control, etc. | Drive or support implementation, oversee projects, manage vendors for specialized tools or services |
Self-assessment or third-party audit preparation | Perform mock assessments, collect evidentiary artifacts, test internal controls, address gaps | Provide internal readiness assessments, manage the audit process or coordinate with a certified assessor (C3PAO) or government audit for Level 3 |
Ongoing compliance / recertification | Maintain control rigor, monitor changes, update policies, manage POA&M, continuous monitoring, incident response, change control | Offer managed compliance services, alerting, review cycles, periodic internal audits, updates for changes in regulation or threat landscape |
Business & Operational Considerations
- Choosing your go-to-market model
You can offer “CMMC as a service,” integration into existing MSSP or security practices, or a hybrid compliance bundle. Be explicit whether you deliver documentation, tooling, assessment support, or entire turnkey compliance. - Risk & liability
The DoD’s CMMC rules expect that contractors maintain a “current CMMC status” and confirm that “there have been no changes in compliance since the contractor achieved the applicable CMMC status.” That means clients are exposed to risk if compliance drifts. You’ll want clearly defined liabilities, change management, and escalation procedures in your contracts. - Supply chain flow-downs
Primes will be obliged to flow CMMC requirements to subcontractors and verify their status before awarding a subcontract. This is an opportunity for MSPs to help smaller-tier suppliers get ready, or to coordinate cascade compliance. - Timing & adoption risk
Phase 1, starting Nov. 10, allows for self-assessments at Level 1. C3PAO capacity is likely to be constrained, so early booking of audit slots will be advantageous. Side note: although technically there are waivers for self-assessments for Level 2, they only serve a very narrow category of DoD contracts and you should not assume the businesses that you serve will be eligible for them. - Pricing and cost transparency
The cost to clients depends on their required CMMC level, network complexity, existing posture, and procurement of new tools. Be transparent in scoping estimates, include buffer for unknowns, and consider fixed-fee with time & materials carve-outs for “unknown remediations.” - Training and awareness
Many CMMC failures are due less to technology and more to human process gaps. You should include security awareness, policy compliance training, role-based access reviews, and behavior change management in your deliverables.
Go-To Steps to Start Today
- Train your internal team on CMMC levels, NIST SP 800‑171 mapping, and audit procedures.
- Develop or adopt standard templates and accelerators (SSP, POA&M, policy libraries, control mappings).
- Reach out to your defense‑contractor clients or prospects to educate them on the approaching deadline and offer readiness audits.
- Reserve slots or relationships with C3PAOs so as not to be caught waiting when demand peaks.
- Build bundled service offers (e.g. managed compliance, security monitoring, audit support) that embed compliance as a value proposition.
- Monitor incoming guidance, DoD CMMC FAQs, and audit trends to keep your service offerings current.
Conclusion
The November 10, 2025 deadline is a watershed moment in defense contracting. For MSPs prepared to partner deeply on compliance, this is a unique inflection point to expand into higher-margin, strategic service lines. Those who help clients not just meet the letter of CMMC but embed control maturity and continuous cyber resilience will drive long-term differentiation.